<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1718 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773605</link>
    <description>Patna HC set aside CIT(A)/NAFC order finding gross negligence and dereliction of duty as the appellate authority acted without examining records. The court noted that an officer at such high position should consider all aspects of appellate matters rather than cause hardship to assessee and multiply litigation. The impugned order was quashed and matter remanded to CIT(A) for fresh consideration with direction to provide personal hearing and pass reasoned order within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 09:23:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=831408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1718 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773605</link>
      <description>Patna HC set aside CIT(A)/NAFC order finding gross negligence and dereliction of duty as the appellate authority acted without examining records. The court noted that an officer at such high position should consider all aspects of appellate matters rather than cause hardship to assessee and multiply litigation. The impugned order was quashed and matter remanded to CIT(A) for fresh consideration with direction to provide personal hearing and pass reasoned order within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>