<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1529 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462462</link>
    <description>Section 153C requires a valid satisfaction note meeting the statutory requirements applicable to the relevant period. The Tribunal applied strict construction and held that a satisfaction note stating only that seized material &quot;relates to&quot; the assessee could not support the assessment for the years in question because that expression was introduced only later by the Finance Act, 2015. The Revenue&#039;s attempt to rely on the amended wording was rejected as inapplicable to the relevant assessment years. The common orders of the first appellate authority were upheld and the Revenue&#039;s appeals failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 22:02:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=831389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1529 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462462</link>
      <description>Section 153C requires a valid satisfaction note meeting the statutory requirements applicable to the relevant period. The Tribunal applied strict construction and held that a satisfaction note stating only that seized material &quot;relates to&quot; the assessee could not support the assessment for the years in question because that expression was introduced only later by the Finance Act, 2015. The Revenue&#039;s attempt to rely on the amended wording was rejected as inapplicable to the relevant assessment years. The common orders of the first appellate authority were upheld and the Revenue&#039;s appeals failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>