<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 125 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44607</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the Revenue&#039;s appeal was untimely and should not be entertained due to the Board&#039;s order being beyond the prescribed period. The Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by considering allegations from a third show cause notice in adjudicating the first and second notices. The Court directed the hearing on remand to focus solely on the merits of the initial show cause notices without including extraneous allegations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 17:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 125 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44607</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the Revenue&#039;s appeal was untimely and should not be entertained due to the Board&#039;s order being beyond the prescribed period. The Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by considering allegations from a third show cause notice in adjudicating the first and second notices. The Court directed the hearing on remand to focus solely on the merits of the initial show cause notices without including extraneous allegations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>