https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44606 Section 11A of the Central Excise Act was treated as in pari materia with Section 28 of the Customs Act, so the ratio of the earlier Supreme Court decision in Union of India v. Jain Shudh Vanaspati Ltd. applied directly. On that basis, the Court found the present controversy covered by binding precedent and dismissed the appeal. No further costs were ordered. en-us Tue, 15 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Jul 2010 11:46:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44606 Section 11A of the Central Excise Act was treated as in pari materia with Section 28 of the Customs Act, so the ratio of the earlier Supreme Court decision in Union of India v. Jain Shudh Vanaspati Ltd. applied directly. On that basis, the Court found the present controversy covered by binding precedent and dismissed the appeal. No further costs were ordered. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 15 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44606