https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44600 The High Court dismissed the petition challenging orders of Assistant Collector, Collector of Central Excise, and CEGAT, regarding Central Excise duty on cement production. The court held that the challenge to CEGAT's order was not maintainable as the petitioner had not pursued a regular appeal. Additionally, the court upheld the validity of Notifications 36/87 and 124/87, finding no discrimination in granting concessions based on specific criteria. The court ruled in favor of the respondents, directing refund of the security amount to the petitioner. en-us Thu, 13 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Jul 2010 11:30:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44600 The High Court dismissed the petition challenging orders of Assistant Collector, Collector of Central Excise, and CEGAT, regarding Central Excise duty on cement production. The court held that the challenge to CEGAT's order was not maintainable as the petitioner had not pursued a regular appeal. Additionally, the court upheld the validity of Notifications 36/87 and 124/87, finding no discrimination in granting concessions based on specific criteria. The court ruled in favor of the respondents, directing refund of the security amount to the petitioner. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 13 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44600