<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 133 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44598</link>
    <description>The court set aside the decision of a new Division Bench that refused to hear a stay matter, emphasizing the importance of judicial discipline and propriety. The court directed a Division Bench to decide the stay matter in accordance with previous observations and directions. An expeditious resolution was mandated within three months, with clarification that the decision did not express any opinion on the case&#039;s merits. As no opposition affidavit was filed, the allegations in the petition were not accepted by the respondents, leading to the disposal of the writ petition with instructions for all parties to act on the court&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 11:13:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 133 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44598</link>
      <description>The court set aside the decision of a new Division Bench that refused to hear a stay matter, emphasizing the importance of judicial discipline and propriety. The court directed a Division Bench to decide the stay matter in accordance with previous observations and directions. An expeditious resolution was mandated within three months, with clarification that the decision did not express any opinion on the case&#039;s merits. As no opposition affidavit was filed, the allegations in the petition were not accepted by the respondents, leading to the disposal of the writ petition with instructions for all parties to act on the court&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>