https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773462 A writ petition under Article 226 challenging an assessment order under the M.P. VAT Act was held not maintainable because the statute provided an efficacious alternative appeal under Section 46(1). Where a fiscal assessment order is appealable and no exceptional ground justifies bypassing that remedy, writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be invoked. The petitioner was left to pursue the statutory appellate remedy in accordance with law, and the challenge to the assessment order did not succeed. en-us Fri, 16 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Jun 2025 08:25:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773462 A writ petition under Article 226 challenging an assessment order under the M.P. VAT Act was held not maintainable because the statute provided an efficacious alternative appeal under Section 46(1). Where a fiscal assessment order is appealable and no exceptional ground justifies bypassing that remedy, writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be invoked. The petitioner was left to pursue the statutory appellate remedy in accordance with law, and the challenge to the assessment order did not succeed. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Fri, 16 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773462