<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1582 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773469</link>
    <description>Composite or indivisible works contract services executed before 01.06.2007 were not liable to service tax, because such contracts could not be brought to tax by reclassifying them under Commercial or Industrial Construction Service. The settled position applied was that works contract service was introduced only from 01.06.2007, so a pre-2007 demand based on another taxable category could not survive. The impugned demand and penalty were therefore unsustainable for the relevant period, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 08:25:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=831189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1582 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773469</link>
      <description>Composite or indivisible works contract services executed before 01.06.2007 were not liable to service tax, because such contracts could not be brought to tax by reclassifying them under Commercial or Industrial Construction Service. The settled position applied was that works contract service was introduced only from 01.06.2007, so a pre-2007 demand based on another taxable category could not survive. The impugned demand and penalty were therefore unsustainable for the relevant period, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>