https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773503 The ex parte appellate order was unsustainable because the record showed that the assessee had filed replies and written submissions on multiple dates, so the finding that no effective hearing was given could not stand. The Commissioner (Appeals) was required to decide the appeal after hearing the assessee and to pass a reasoned order in compliance with section 250(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. For breach of natural justice and defective appellate adjudication, the order was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh disposal after hearing the assessee. en-us Mon, 26 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Jun 2025 08:25:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773503 The ex parte appellate order was unsustainable because the record showed that the assessee had filed replies and written submissions on multiple dates, so the finding that no effective hearing was given could not stand. The Commissioner (Appeals) was required to decide the appeal after hearing the assessee and to pass a reasoned order in compliance with section 250(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. For breach of natural justice and defective appellate adjudication, the order was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh disposal after hearing the assessee. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 26 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773503