<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1657 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773544</link>
    <description>Cancellation of GST registration for continuous non-filing of returns may be interfered with where conditional relief is necessary to protect the Revenue&#039;s interest. The Madras HC followed its earlier view that such cancellation orders can be set aside if the taxpayer complies with the prescribed conditions, and directed the impugned cancellation to stand quashed subject to compliance with those requirements. The writ petition was accordingly allowed on a conditional basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 08:25:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=831114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1657 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773544</link>
      <description>Cancellation of GST registration for continuous non-filing of returns may be interfered with where conditional relief is necessary to protect the Revenue&#039;s interest. The Madras HC followed its earlier view that such cancellation orders can be set aside if the taxpayer complies with the prescribed conditions, and directed the impugned cancellation to stand quashed subject to compliance with those requirements. The writ petition was accordingly allowed on a conditional basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>