<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1660 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773547</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging an order-in-original under the GST enactments was found not maintainable because an effective statutory appellate remedy was available. The Court declined to entertain the writ and directed the petitioner to pursue the appeal remedy instead, subject to compliance with the pre-deposit requirement. Liberty was granted to file the statutory appeal within the time allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 08:25:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=831111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1660 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773547</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging an order-in-original under the GST enactments was found not maintainable because an effective statutory appellate remedy was available. The Court declined to entertain the writ and directed the petitioner to pursue the appeal remedy instead, subject to compliance with the pre-deposit requirement. Liberty was granted to file the statutory appeal within the time allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>