https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462443 Section 47 CPC confines the executing court to questions of execution, discharge, or satisfaction of the decree, and it cannot reopen a final order on executability unless a jurisdictional defect is shown. A belated objection raised nearly four years after the execution order was treated as an impermissible attempt to re-agitate a matter that had already attained finality. Res judicata and constructive res judicata barred the same issue from being reopened at a later stage of the execution proceedings. The executing court's refusal to reopen the earlier order was upheld, while the revisional court and High Court orders interfering with that view were held unsustainable. en-us Mon, 30 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Jun 2025 19:25:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462443 Section 47 CPC confines the executing court to questions of execution, discharge, or satisfaction of the decree, and it cannot reopen a final order on executability unless a jurisdictional defect is shown. A belated objection raised nearly four years after the execution order was treated as an impermissible attempt to re-agitate a matter that had already attained finality. Res judicata and constructive res judicata barred the same issue from being reopened at a later stage of the execution proceedings. The executing court's refusal to reopen the earlier order was upheld, while the revisional court and High Court orders interfering with that view were held unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 30 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462443