https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44578 A writ petition should not be entertained at the threshold to restrain possible future use of statements recorded under statutory powers for prosecution or other penal action. Statements recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act and Section 40 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act were sought to be treated as unusable in any later proceeding, but the Court set aside the High Court's order and left the merits open. It clarified that no opinion was expressed on admissibility or the substantive objections, which could still be raised in appropriate future proceedings if action was taken on the basis of those statements. en-us Tue, 18 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:07:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44578 A writ petition should not be entertained at the threshold to restrain possible future use of statements recorded under statutory powers for prosecution or other penal action. Statements recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act and Section 40 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act were sought to be treated as unusable in any later proceeding, but the Court set aside the High Court's order and left the merits open. It clarified that no opinion was expressed on admissibility or the substantive objections, which could still be raised in appropriate future proceedings if action was taken on the basis of those statements. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 18 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44578