<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1894 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462446</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai held that rental receipts from a real estate company should be classified as business income rather than income from house property, given the company&#039;s primary objective of dealing in real estate and rental income being its main source. The tribunal applied consistency principle, noting revenue had accepted this classification in other years. Issues regarding interest income classification and business loss set-off were remitted to AO for re-adjudication following established precedents from the assessee&#039;s own case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 10:21:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=831067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1894 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462446</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai held that rental receipts from a real estate company should be classified as business income rather than income from house property, given the company&#039;s primary objective of dealing in real estate and rental income being its main source. The tribunal applied consistency principle, noting revenue had accepted this classification in other years. Issues regarding interest income classification and business loss set-off were remitted to AO for re-adjudication following established precedents from the assessee&#039;s own case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>