<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 895 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462440</link>
    <description>Punitive charges for overloading under the Railways Act, 1989 are enforceable only before delivery of the consignment; after delivery, the railway administration cannot invoke lien under Section 83 to recover such charges. The commentary reads Sections 73, 78, 79 and 83 together and explains that the statutory power to levy penalty, and the corresponding right to detain goods as security for freight or other dues, operates as a pre-delivery mechanism. Once delivery has been made, a post-delivery demand for punitive charges is described as unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 19:18:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=831054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 895 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462440</link>
      <description>Punitive charges for overloading under the Railways Act, 1989 are enforceable only before delivery of the consignment; after delivery, the railway administration cannot invoke lien under Section 83 to recover such charges. The commentary reads Sections 73, 78, 79 and 83 together and explains that the statutory power to levy penalty, and the corresponding right to detain goods as security for freight or other dues, operates as a pre-delivery mechanism. Once delivery has been made, a post-delivery demand for punitive charges is described as unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>