<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 53 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44575</link>
    <description>Tax credit for excise duty was restricted to duty chargeable under the Central Excises and Salt Act, following earlier precedent, so the broader claim for credit failed. For relief computation, separately excisable paper products had to be treated independently because each type was assessed under different tariff entries as produced, so base-year production was to be calculated separately for each type of paper. The result was that the excise-credit challenge failed, while the separate-treatment principle for relief computation was accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:02:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 53 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44575</link>
      <description>Tax credit for excise duty was restricted to duty chargeable under the Central Excises and Salt Act, following earlier precedent, so the broader claim for credit failed. For relief computation, separately excisable paper products had to be treated independently because each type was assessed under different tariff entries as produced, so base-year production was to be calculated separately for each type of paper. The result was that the excise-credit challenge failed, while the separate-treatment principle for relief computation was accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>