<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 787 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462437</link>
    <description>A final judgment declaring land acquisition proceedings and the award void had to be given full effect in later land-grabbing proceedings, because the landowners&#039; title remained intact and the acquiring body had no enforceable right over the land; the direction restoring possession was therefore upheld. A finding that some respondents had perfected title by adverse possession could not be conclusively sustained in those proceedings, since adverse possession depends on proof of long, hostile possession and the exact title claim and land identity required determination by the civil court. That finding was set aside, with liberty to pursue the claim before the competent civil court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 11:47:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=830986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 787 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462437</link>
      <description>A final judgment declaring land acquisition proceedings and the award void had to be given full effect in later land-grabbing proceedings, because the landowners&#039; title remained intact and the acquiring body had no enforceable right over the land; the direction restoring possession was therefore upheld. A finding that some respondents had perfected title by adverse possession could not be conclusively sustained in those proceedings, since adverse possession depends on proof of long, hostile possession and the exact title claim and land identity required determination by the civil court. That finding was set aside, with liberty to pursue the claim before the competent civil court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>