<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1514 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773401</link>
    <description>A suit instituted during an operative insolvency moratorium is barred by the overriding provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and a later lifting of the moratorium does not cure the defect in institution. Where the bar is evident from the record, the plaint is liable to rejection at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11 read with Section 151 CPC, because civil court jurisdiction yields to the insolvency regime for proceedings against the corporate debtor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 08:42:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=830913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1514 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773401</link>
      <description>A suit instituted during an operative insolvency moratorium is barred by the overriding provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and a later lifting of the moratorium does not cure the defect in institution. Where the bar is evident from the record, the plaint is liable to rejection at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11 read with Section 151 CPC, because civil court jurisdiction yields to the insolvency regime for proceedings against the corporate debtor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>