<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1532 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773419</link>
    <description>ITAT Hyderabad ruled on transfer pricing comparable selection for a software development company providing services to its associated enterprise on cost-plus basis. The tribunal excluded multiple comparables including Tata Elxsi Limited, Persistent Systems Limited, Aspire Systems, Infosys Limited, Thirdware Solutions Limited, and Cybage Software Private Limited due to functional dissimilarity, diversified activities, turnover filters, and extraordinary events. However, it retained Larsen &amp;amp; Toubro Infotech Limited and Infobeans Technologies Limited as the appellant had originally selected them as comparables. The tribunal also rejected the appellant&#039;s argument regarding bad debt provisions being operating in nature for profit level indicator computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 08:42:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=830895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1532 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773419</link>
      <description>ITAT Hyderabad ruled on transfer pricing comparable selection for a software development company providing services to its associated enterprise on cost-plus basis. The tribunal excluded multiple comparables including Tata Elxsi Limited, Persistent Systems Limited, Aspire Systems, Infosys Limited, Thirdware Solutions Limited, and Cybage Software Private Limited due to functional dissimilarity, diversified activities, turnover filters, and extraordinary events. However, it retained Larsen &amp;amp; Toubro Infotech Limited and Infobeans Technologies Limited as the appellant had originally selected them as comparables. The tribunal also rejected the appellant&#039;s argument regarding bad debt provisions being operating in nature for profit level indicator computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>