<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1534 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773421</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi held that receipts from data transmission services do not constitute royalty under Article 12(4) of the DTAA with Netherlands. The Tribunal followed consistent precedents from assessment years 2006-07 to 2021-22, ruling that Finance Act 2012 amendments do not affect DTAA provisions. The addition was deleted, confirming that data transmission service income remains outside royalty definition unless DTAAs are jointly amended by both countries. Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 08:42:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=830893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1534 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773421</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi held that receipts from data transmission services do not constitute royalty under Article 12(4) of the DTAA with Netherlands. The Tribunal followed consistent precedents from assessment years 2006-07 to 2021-22, ruling that Finance Act 2012 amendments do not affect DTAA provisions. The addition was deleted, confirming that data transmission service income remains outside royalty definition unless DTAAs are jointly amended by both countries. Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>