<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1553 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773440</link>
    <description>Where a later CBDT circular supersedes earlier instructions and raises the monetary threshold without retaining the earlier revenue-audit objection exception, an appeal below the revised tax-effect limit cannot be continued on merits. The later circular was applied because the tax effect was below the revised limit of Rs. 2 crores, so the appeal was treated as not maintainable and disposed of in accordance with the binding monetary-limit instruction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 08:42:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=830874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1553 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773440</link>
      <description>Where a later CBDT circular supersedes earlier instructions and raises the monetary threshold without retaining the earlier revenue-audit objection exception, an appeal below the revised tax-effect limit cannot be continued on merits. The later circular was applied because the tax effect was below the revised limit of Rs. 2 crores, so the appeal was treated as not maintainable and disposed of in accordance with the binding monetary-limit instruction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>