<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1562 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773449</link>
    <description>Writ petitions were disposed of by permitting the petitioners to file statutory appeals within the stipulated time on deposit of 25% of the disputed tax. The appellate authority was directed to entertain the appeals without reference to limitation and decide them on merits. The operative effect was to preserve the petitioners&#039; appellate remedy subject to the specified pre-deposit, while requiring the merits of the tax dispute to be examined in appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 08:42:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=830865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1562 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773449</link>
      <description>Writ petitions were disposed of by permitting the petitioners to file statutory appeals within the stipulated time on deposit of 25% of the disputed tax. The appellate authority was directed to entertain the appeals without reference to limitation and decide them on merits. The operative effect was to preserve the petitioners&#039; appellate remedy subject to the specified pre-deposit, while requiring the merits of the tax dispute to be examined in appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>