https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44557 The Supreme Court's Chandra Kumar principle was applied to hold that any provision excluding the High Court's writ jurisdiction under Article 226/227 is ineffective, while tribunal decisions remain subject to High Court scrutiny. On that basis, although the sales tax dispute had been routed to the Taxation Tribunal, the matter could not be finally dealt with by a single Judge and had to proceed before an appropriate Division Bench. The single Judge therefore made a reference to the Acting Chief Justice for placement of the petition before a Division Bench, with interim administrative directions issued for further hearing. en-us Sun, 03 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:28:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44557 The Supreme Court's Chandra Kumar principle was applied to hold that any provision excluding the High Court's writ jurisdiction under Article 226/227 is ineffective, while tribunal decisions remain subject to High Court scrutiny. On that basis, although the sales tax dispute had been routed to the Taxation Tribunal, the matter could not be finally dealt with by a single Judge and had to proceed before an appropriate Division Bench. The single Judge therefore made a reference to the Acting Chief Justice for placement of the petition before a Division Bench, with interim administrative directions issued for further hearing. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Sun, 03 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44557