<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 2179 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462434</link>
    <description>An earlier withdrawal of appeals did not bar the assessee from contesting the attribution of 25% royalty in later assessment years. The appellate authority was required to consider the later-year objections on merits and could not treat the prior withdrawal as determinative of those subsequent proceedings. The right to raise the same or connected challenge therefore remained open in the later appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2025 11:38:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=830822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 2179 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462434</link>
      <description>An earlier withdrawal of appeals did not bar the assessee from contesting the attribution of 25% royalty in later assessment years. The appellate authority was required to consider the later-year objections on merits and could not treat the prior withdrawal as determinative of those subsequent proceedings. The right to raise the same or connected challenge therefore remained open in the later appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>