<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 80 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44551</link>
    <description>Printed cartons remain cartons rather than products of the printing industry where their manufacture principally involves cutting, creasing, shaping and pasting cardboard, and printing is merely decorative or incidental. Classification depends on whether printing itself brings the article into existence, not on the presence of printed matter. The distinction applicable to printed aluminium labels does not extend to cartons because the disputed article retains its character as packaging. Consequently, printed cartons do not qualify for exemption available to products of the printing industry, and the exemption claim fails.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 80 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44551</link>
      <description>Printed cartons remain cartons rather than products of the printing industry where their manufacture principally involves cutting, creasing, shaping and pasting cardboard, and printing is merely decorative or incidental. Classification depends on whether printing itself brings the article into existence, not on the presence of printed matter. The distinction applicable to printed aluminium labels does not extend to cartons because the disputed article retains its character as packaging. Consequently, printed cartons do not qualify for exemption available to products of the printing industry, and the exemption claim fails.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>