https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44549 Reliable eyewitness testimony, corroborated by a prompt FIR and surrounding circumstances, can establish both the accused's identity and intentional participation in a fatal act. The Court accepted evidence that the appellant was driving the truck on the relevant occasion, that the vehicle was deliberately driven into a customs jeep, and that the manner of the second impact supported an inference of intent rather than accident. On that footing, the convictions under Section 302 IPC and the connected counts were sustained, with no error found in the trial court's acceptance of the identification evidence. en-us Mon, 05 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Jul 2014 12:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44549 Reliable eyewitness testimony, corroborated by a prompt FIR and surrounding circumstances, can establish both the accused's identity and intentional participation in a fatal act. The Court accepted evidence that the appellant was driving the truck on the relevant occasion, that the vehicle was deliberately driven into a customs jeep, and that the manner of the second impact supported an inference of intent rather than accident. On that footing, the convictions under Section 302 IPC and the connected counts were sustained, with no error found in the trial court's acceptance of the identification evidence. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 05 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44549