https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=47228 Whether a high court may act as the custodian of the revenue was considered after CESTAT allowed a service tax appeal directing a refund and the revenue's appeal under section 35G was recorded as not maintainable; the high court noted the writ and appeal were disposed of as not pressed yet recorded an eight week restraint on the tribunal's refund direction, prompting the Supreme Court to issue notice to the revenue and temporarily interrupt the high court order while permitting a possible appeal under section 35L. en-us Sat, 21 Jun 2025 15:16:03 +0530 Sat, 21 Jun 2025 15:16:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=47228 Whether a high court may act as the custodian of the revenue was considered after CESTAT allowed a service tax appeal directing a refund and the revenue's appeal under section 35G was recorded as not maintainable; the high court noted the writ and appeal were disposed of as not pressed yet recorded an eight week restraint on the tribunal's refund direction, prompting the Supreme Court to issue notice to the revenue and temporarily interrupt the high court order while permitting a possible appeal under section 35L. News - Sat, 21 Jun 2025 15:16:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=47228