<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 96 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44544</link>
    <description>Withdrawal of an excise exemption can make duty payable on excisable goods still lying in stock and not yet consumed in manufacture. The taxable event remains manufacture, but collection may validly be deferred to the stage of removal for administrative convenience. On that basis, cotton yarn remaining in the assessee&#039;s stock after withdrawal of the exemption was held liable to duty, while yarn already used in cotton fabrics was outside the surviving demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 18:39:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 96 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44544</link>
      <description>Withdrawal of an excise exemption can make duty payable on excisable goods still lying in stock and not yet consumed in manufacture. The taxable event remains manufacture, but collection may validly be deferred to the stage of removal for administrative convenience. On that basis, cotton yarn remaining in the assessee&#039;s stock after withdrawal of the exemption was held liable to duty, while yarn already used in cotton fabrics was outside the surviving demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>