<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 1379 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462420</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes after the CIT(A) refused to admit additional evidence. The tribunal held that the additional evidence was crucial to the dispute&#039;s resolution and served the interests of justice. The ITAT admitted the additional evidence and remanded the matter back to the CIT(A) with directions to decide the appeal afresh after providing due opportunity to the assessee and considering the newly admitted evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2025 08:29:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=830722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 1379 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462420</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes after the CIT(A) refused to admit additional evidence. The tribunal held that the additional evidence was crucial to the dispute&#039;s resolution and served the interests of justice. The ITAT admitted the additional evidence and remanded the matter back to the CIT(A) with directions to decide the appeal afresh after providing due opportunity to the assessee and considering the newly admitted evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>