<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1443 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773330</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata held that imported quicklime with calcium oxide purity less than 98% is correctly classifiable under Customs Tariff Item 2522 1000, not under 2825 9090. Following precedent in JSW Steel Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs, Cochin, the tribunal determined that quicklime with 92% purity falls under CTH 2522 1000. The impugned orders were set aside and appeal allowed, establishing that purity percentage is the determining factor for tariff classification of quicklime products.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2025 08:28:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=830666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1443 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773330</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata held that imported quicklime with calcium oxide purity less than 98% is correctly classifiable under Customs Tariff Item 2522 1000, not under 2825 9090. Following precedent in JSW Steel Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs, Cochin, the tribunal determined that quicklime with 92% purity falls under CTH 2522 1000. The impugned orders were set aside and appeal allowed, establishing that purity percentage is the determining factor for tariff classification of quicklime products.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>