<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1445 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773332</link>
    <description>CESTAT Chennai held that interest under Section 27A of Customs Act, 1962 is payable only if refund is not sanctioned within three months from receipt of complete refund claim and documents. The appellant&#039;s provisional assessment resulted in excess duty refund but claimed interest for delayed payment. Following Karnataka HC precedent in Commissioner of Customs Mangaluru v JSW Steel Ltd, the tribunal found the proper officer sanctioned refund within three months after receiving appellant&#039;s complete reply to defective appeal notice. The appellant cannot benefit from delays caused by incomplete documentation. Appeal dismissed, upholding rejection of interest claim on delayed refund payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2025 08:28:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=830664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1445 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773332</link>
      <description>CESTAT Chennai held that interest under Section 27A of Customs Act, 1962 is payable only if refund is not sanctioned within three months from receipt of complete refund claim and documents. The appellant&#039;s provisional assessment resulted in excess duty refund but claimed interest for delayed payment. Following Karnataka HC precedent in Commissioner of Customs Mangaluru v JSW Steel Ltd, the tribunal found the proper officer sanctioned refund within three months after receiving appellant&#039;s complete reply to defective appeal notice. The appellant cannot benefit from delays caused by incomplete documentation. Appeal dismissed, upholding rejection of interest claim on delayed refund payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>