<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1455 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773342</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the cooperative society&#039;s claim for deduction under section 80P for both commission income of Rs. 6,11,030 earned from MSEDCL and interest income on deposits with MSEDCL and Government Securities. The Tribunal held that commission income earned from collecting bills and dues on behalf of government entities constitutes banking activity eligible for section 80P(2)(a)(i) deduction, following the binding precedent in CIT vs. Ahmednagar Dist. Coop. Bank Ltd. The interest income on mandatory deposits made to comply with liquidity requirements was also deemed incidental to the society&#039;s main objects and qualified for deduction, as these were not surplus funds placed with scheduled banks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2025 08:28:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=830654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1455 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773342</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the cooperative society&#039;s claim for deduction under section 80P for both commission income of Rs. 6,11,030 earned from MSEDCL and interest income on deposits with MSEDCL and Government Securities. The Tribunal held that commission income earned from collecting bills and dues on behalf of government entities constitutes banking activity eligible for section 80P(2)(a)(i) deduction, following the binding precedent in CIT vs. Ahmednagar Dist. Coop. Bank Ltd. The interest income on mandatory deposits made to comply with liquidity requirements was also deemed incidental to the society&#039;s main objects and qualified for deduction, as these were not surplus funds placed with scheduled banks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>