https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44531 Delay was condoned, but the SC dismissed the Special Leave Petitions because the Revenue failed to explain why it had not filed appeals against other High Court orders passed at the same time, despite being given an opportunity to do so. The Court declined interference to avoid inconsistent orders and expressly made no finding on the merits. The connected civil appeal was then dismissed as not maintainable for the same reason, since allowing it to proceed after dismissal of the Special Leave Petitions could have led to conflicting outcomes. en-us Thu, 21 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:59:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44531 Delay was condoned, but the SC dismissed the Special Leave Petitions because the Revenue failed to explain why it had not filed appeals against other High Court orders passed at the same time, despite being given an opportunity to do so. The Court declined interference to avoid inconsistent orders and expressly made no finding on the merits. The connected civil appeal was then dismissed as not maintainable for the same reason, since allowing it to proceed after dismissal of the Special Leave Petitions could have led to conflicting outcomes. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 21 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44531