<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 144 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44530</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, referencing the Kasinka Trading case. The judgment did not address the public interest in shortening an Exemption Notification period, although it was presumed. No costs were granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:58:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 144 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44530</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, referencing the Kasinka Trading case. The judgment did not address the public interest in shortening an Exemption Notification period, although it was presumed. No costs were granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>