https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462405 Territorial jurisdiction under Rule 6 of the Armed Forces Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 2008 depends on the applicant's posting, last posting or attachment, residence after cessation of service, or the place where the cause of action arises. On the pleaded facts, the petitioner was posted at Leh, did not reside within Delhi, and no material showed that the reporting or reviewing officers for the ACRs were within the Principal Bench's jurisdiction. The place where the statutory complaint was decided did not by itself confer forum conveniens. The Delhi HC therefore found the Principal Bench not to be the proper forum, upheld transfer to the Chandigarh Bench, and refused interference with the Tribunal's order. en-us Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jun 2025 17:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462405 Territorial jurisdiction under Rule 6 of the Armed Forces Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 2008 depends on the applicant's posting, last posting or attachment, residence after cessation of service, or the place where the cause of action arises. On the pleaded facts, the petitioner was posted at Leh, did not reside within Delhi, and no material showed that the reporting or reviewing officers for the ACRs were within the Principal Bench's jurisdiction. The place where the statutory complaint was decided did not by itself confer forum conveniens. The Delhi HC therefore found the Principal Bench not to be the proper forum, upheld transfer to the Chandigarh Bench, and refused interference with the Tribunal's order. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462405