<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 99 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44515</link>
    <description>Imported polyester chips (textile grade) were held classifiable under Heading 38.01/19(1) and not under Heading 39.01/06, because the classification issue had already been settled by an earlier binding decision applying the assessee&#039;s claimed heading. The contrary revenue classification could not be sustained. The separate refund question was not finally determined and was remitted for consideration under the Court&#039;s format order and the governing refund principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:08:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 99 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44515</link>
      <description>Imported polyester chips (textile grade) were held classifiable under Heading 38.01/19(1) and not under Heading 39.01/06, because the classification issue had already been settled by an earlier binding decision applying the assessee&#039;s claimed heading. The contrary revenue classification could not be sustained. The separate refund question was not finally determined and was remitted for consideration under the Court&#039;s format order and the governing refund principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>