<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ITAT prevents double taxation of unbilled revenue erroneously offered twice by appellant across assessment years</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89605</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed appellant&#039;s appeal regarding double taxation of unbilled revenue. Appellant erroneously offered excess income to tax by accruing unbilled revenue from one customer, which was subsequently taxed again in AY 2019-20 upon invoice generation. Tribunal examined computation statements and revised returns, confirming revenue reduction in FY 2019-20 was added back in AY 2020-21 computation. ITAT found merit in appellant&#039;s contention that income was taxed twice - initially as unbilled revenue in respective financial years and again upon invoice raising in the assessment year under consideration. Tribunal directed Assessing Officer to reduce appellant&#039;s income by the amount erroneously excess offered to tax, preventing double taxation of the same revenue stream.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:35:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:35:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=830435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ITAT prevents double taxation of unbilled revenue erroneously offered twice by appellant across assessment years</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89605</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed appellant&#039;s appeal regarding double taxation of unbilled revenue. Appellant erroneously offered excess income to tax by accruing unbilled revenue from one customer, which was subsequently taxed again in AY 2019-20 upon invoice generation. Tribunal examined computation statements and revised returns, confirming revenue reduction in FY 2019-20 was added back in AY 2020-21 computation. ITAT found merit in appellant&#039;s contention that income was taxed twice - initially as unbilled revenue in respective financial years and again upon invoice raising in the assessment year under consideration. Tribunal directed Assessing Officer to reduce appellant&#039;s income by the amount erroneously excess offered to tax, preventing double taxation of the same revenue stream.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:35:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>