<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 118 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44514</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case concerning the determination of wholesale price for excise duty on fabrics manufactured by the appellant-Company. The Court agreed that the transactions through intermediary firms were a device to manipulate assessable value, ruling that the proper assessable value should be the purchase price paid by M/s. Agarcon to the intermediary firms. The Court dismissed the appeal and imposed costs on the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 118 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44514</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case concerning the determination of wholesale price for excise duty on fabrics manufactured by the appellant-Company. The Court agreed that the transactions through intermediary firms were a device to manipulate assessable value, ruling that the proper assessable value should be the purchase price paid by M/s. Agarcon to the intermediary firms. The Court dismissed the appeal and imposed costs on the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>