https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44511 Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal were not justified where the Tribunal found the appeal was at least partly covered by an earlier Supreme Court decision, so no strong prima facie case was shown. Financial difficulty alone was insufficient to secure complete waiver, especially since the Tribunal had already allowed payment by instalments. Interference with the Tribunal's order was declined, but the appellants were given six weeks to deposit the amount, failing which the appeal would stand dismissed. en-us Wed, 19 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Jun 2010 16:55:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44511 Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal were not justified where the Tribunal found the appeal was at least partly covered by an earlier Supreme Court decision, so no strong prima facie case was shown. Financial difficulty alone was insufficient to secure complete waiver, especially since the Tribunal had already allowed payment by instalments. Interference with the Tribunal's order was declined, but the appellants were given six weeks to deposit the amount, failing which the appeal would stand dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 19 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44511