https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773257 The HC quashed the respondent's order withdrawing petitioner's empanelment as Chartered Engineer for violating natural justice principles by denying opportunity of hearing. The court held that withdrawal without proper enquiry was arbitrary and affected petitioner's livelihood rights. Professional liability cannot be presumed based on client violations without adequate proof. The court directed respondent to conduct fair enquiry within four weeks, providing hearing opportunity to petitioner, and kept the impugned order in abeyance pending final determination. en-us Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:34:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773257 The HC quashed the respondent's order withdrawing petitioner's empanelment as Chartered Engineer for violating natural justice principles by denying opportunity of hearing. The court held that withdrawal without proper enquiry was arbitrary and affected petitioner's livelihood rights. Professional liability cannot be presumed based on client violations without adequate proof. The court directed respondent to conduct fair enquiry within four weeks, providing hearing opportunity to petitioner, and kept the impugned order in abeyance pending final determination. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773257