<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1378 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773265</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the appeal and remanded the matter to CIT(E) for fresh consideration. The court held that mere inclusion of religious objects in a trust&#039;s constitution does not automatically disqualify it from section 80G registration. The statutory framework permits trusts with incidental religious purposes if expenditure on religious activities remains below 5% of total income as per section 80G(5B). The CIT(E) erred by rejecting the application without conducting adequate inquiry into actual religious expenditure or considering the assessee&#039;s submissions, violating natural justice principles. The court directed CIT(E) to verify compliance with the 5% threshold before determining eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:34:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=830390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1378 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773265</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the appeal and remanded the matter to CIT(E) for fresh consideration. The court held that mere inclusion of religious objects in a trust&#039;s constitution does not automatically disqualify it from section 80G registration. The statutory framework permits trusts with incidental religious purposes if expenditure on religious activities remains below 5% of total income as per section 80G(5B). The CIT(E) erred by rejecting the application without conducting adequate inquiry into actual religious expenditure or considering the assessee&#039;s submissions, violating natural justice principles. The court directed CIT(E) to verify compliance with the 5% threshold before determining eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>