https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773280 ITAT Bangalore condoned 61-day delay in filing appeal, finding sufficient cause existed under Section 253(5). The Tribunal emphasized that rejecting delay condonation would legalize injustice on technical grounds when remedy is available. Regarding Section 80G approval rejection, the Tribunal noted procedural irregularity as notices and rejection order were issued in wrong entity name (Bangalore Medical College instead of Bangalore Medical College Alumni Association). The matter was remitted to CIT(E) for fresh adjudication due to confusion and procedural defects. Appeal partly allowed for statistical purposes. en-us Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:34:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773280 ITAT Bangalore condoned 61-day delay in filing appeal, finding sufficient cause existed under Section 253(5). The Tribunal emphasized that rejecting delay condonation would legalize injustice on technical grounds when remedy is available. Regarding Section 80G approval rejection, the Tribunal noted procedural irregularity as notices and rejection order were issued in wrong entity name (Bangalore Medical College instead of Bangalore Medical College Alumni Association). The matter was remitted to CIT(E) for fresh adjudication due to confusion and procedural defects. Appeal partly allowed for statistical purposes. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773280