https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773299 A notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act was challenged on the ground that, under the CBDT faceless regime dated 29 March 2022 read with Section 151A, it had to be issued by the Faceless Assessing Officer rather than the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer. The Bombay HC noted that the point was already covered by its earlier decision and, pending further proceedings, granted interim protection to the petitioner. Rule was issued and the impugned notice, together with all consequential proceedings, was stayed until final disposal of the writ petition. en-us Mon, 16 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:34:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773299 A notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act was challenged on the ground that, under the CBDT faceless regime dated 29 March 2022 read with Section 151A, it had to be issued by the Faceless Assessing Officer rather than the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer. The Bombay HC noted that the point was already covered by its earlier decision and, pending further proceedings, granted interim protection to the petitioner. Rule was issued and the impugned notice, together with all consequential proceedings, was stayed until final disposal of the writ petition. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 16 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773299