https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773300 The HC allowed the writ petition challenging reassessment notices under sections 148A and 148, holding them invalid for not being issued in faceless manner as required by Finance Act 2021. The court followed its earlier precedent in Kankanala Ravindra Reddy case, noting that despite 16 months since that judgment, the Income Tax Department continues issuing non-faceless notices in violation of statutory amendments. The court quashed the impugned notices but made the order subject to the outcome of pending SLP before SC challenging the Kankanala Ravindra Reddy decision. en-us Mon, 16 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:34:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773300 The HC allowed the writ petition challenging reassessment notices under sections 148A and 148, holding them invalid for not being issued in faceless manner as required by Finance Act 2021. The court followed its earlier precedent in Kankanala Ravindra Reddy case, noting that despite 16 months since that judgment, the Income Tax Department continues issuing non-faceless notices in violation of statutory amendments. The court quashed the impugned notices but made the order subject to the outcome of pending SLP before SC challenging the Kankanala Ravindra Reddy decision. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 16 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773300