https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773302 The Meghalaya HC disposed of writ petitions seeking stay of recovery proceedings under Section 156 and directions against freezing bank accounts or coercive action. Though petitioner pursued dual remedies (writ petition and statutory appeal under Section 246A), the HC granted interim relief considering pending appeals awaiting condonation of delay and petitioner's Khasi Scheduled Tribe status with exemption under Section 10(26) of Income Tax Act, 1961. The HC directed CIT(Appeals) to decide appeals within four weeks, maintaining interim protection until disposal, with instructions to de-freeze accounts if no orders emerge within the stipulated period. en-us Tue, 17 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:34:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773302 The Meghalaya HC disposed of writ petitions seeking stay of recovery proceedings under Section 156 and directions against freezing bank accounts or coercive action. Though petitioner pursued dual remedies (writ petition and statutory appeal under Section 246A), the HC granted interim relief considering pending appeals awaiting condonation of delay and petitioner's Khasi Scheduled Tribe status with exemption under Section 10(26) of Income Tax Act, 1961. The HC directed CIT(Appeals) to decide appeals within four weeks, maintaining interim protection until disposal, with instructions to de-freeze accounts if no orders emerge within the stipulated period. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 17 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773302