https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773309 In a GST evasion bail matter involving alleged fake firms, fake invoices and fraudulent input tax credit, the High Court treated the gravity of the economic offence, the scale of the alleged revenue loss, the accused's suppression of prior antecedents and the alleged attempt to abscond as decisive against release. It held that economic offences warrant a stricter approach because they affect public revenue and financial integrity, and that parity with a co-accused was unavailable where the applicant's conduct was materially different. Bail was refused on the combined effect of seriousness of the allegations and adverse conduct. en-us Wed, 18 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:34:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773309 In a GST evasion bail matter involving alleged fake firms, fake invoices and fraudulent input tax credit, the High Court treated the gravity of the economic offence, the scale of the alleged revenue loss, the accused's suppression of prior antecedents and the alleged attempt to abscond as decisive against release. It held that economic offences warrant a stricter approach because they affect public revenue and financial integrity, and that parity with a co-accused was unavailable where the applicant's conduct was materially different. Bail was refused on the combined effect of seriousness of the allegations and adverse conduct. Case-Laws GST Wed, 18 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773309