<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 1220 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462403</link>
    <description>HC held that non-compete fee received by assessee company from UK company for restraining from entering insurance business constituted capital receipt, not revenue. Following Sundaram Finance Ltd precedent and SC decision in Guffic Chem, court confirmed amount credited to capital receipt account did not fall within Section 2(24) income definition. CIT(A) correctly deleted AO&#039;s addition. Depreciation on UPS and voltage stabilizer allowed at 60% instead of assessee&#039;s claimed 100% or revenue&#039;s assessed 25%.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 18:54:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=830310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 1220 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462403</link>
      <description>HC held that non-compete fee received by assessee company from UK company for restraining from entering insurance business constituted capital receipt, not revenue. Following Sundaram Finance Ltd precedent and SC decision in Guffic Chem, court confirmed amount credited to capital receipt account did not fall within Section 2(24) income definition. CIT(A) correctly deleted AO&#039;s addition. Depreciation on UPS and voltage stabilizer allowed at 60% instead of assessee&#039;s claimed 100% or revenue&#039;s assessed 25%.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>