https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44502 The writ challenge to excise and customs reclassification orders was held not maintainable because the statute provided an effective appellate hierarchy on facts and law. The Court applied the settled rule that writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be exercised where an alternative statutory remedy exists, unless there is lack of jurisdiction, breach of natural justice, or other exceptional grounds. As the petitioners could pursue the prescribed appeals, direct recourse under Article 226 was declined and the writ petitions were dismissed, leaving the parties to the statutory appellate process. en-us Fri, 29 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Jun 2010 16:16:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44502 The writ challenge to excise and customs reclassification orders was held not maintainable because the statute provided an effective appellate hierarchy on facts and law. The Court applied the settled rule that writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be exercised where an alternative statutory remedy exists, unless there is lack of jurisdiction, breach of natural justice, or other exceptional grounds. As the petitioners could pursue the prescribed appeals, direct recourse under Article 226 was declined and the writ petitions were dismissed, leaving the parties to the statutory appellate process. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44502