<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (12) TMI 92 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44495</link>
    <description>Cess on imported polyester filament yarn was examined under the statutory scheme governing textiles and customs. The text explains that the levy derived from Section 5A(1) of the Textiles Committee Act, 1963, while imports could attract additional customs duty under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 read with Section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962, measured by reference to the excise duty on like goods manufactured in India. It emphasises that the character of a fiscal impost depends on the charging provision, not the measure used. On that basis, the levy was treated as legally sustainable and the constitutional challenge under Articles 19(1)(g), 265 and 300A failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 15:42:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (12) TMI 92 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44495</link>
      <description>Cess on imported polyester filament yarn was examined under the statutory scheme governing textiles and customs. The text explains that the levy derived from Section 5A(1) of the Textiles Committee Act, 1963, while imports could attract additional customs duty under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 read with Section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962, measured by reference to the excise duty on like goods manufactured in India. It emphasises that the character of a fiscal impost depends on the charging provision, not the measure used. On that basis, the levy was treated as legally sustainable and the constitutional challenge under Articles 19(1)(g), 265 and 300A failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>