<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>NRI petitioner wins TDS refund case despite delayed ITR filing due to Covid travel restrictions under Section 119(2)(b)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89579</link>
    <description>HC allowed petition filed by NRI petitioner seeking TDS refund despite delayed ITR filing. Petitioner, residing in London and Northern Ireland with OCI status, contended Covid-19 pandemic and travel restrictions prevented timely consultation with Indian tax advisors for filing returns. Court held respondent failed to consider petitioner&#039;s non-resident status and genuine hardship caused by pandemic-related travel restrictions. Since petitioner had no statutory obligation to file returns for immovable property sale transactions as non-resident, and demonstrated bona fide reasons for delay, respondent should have exercised discretionary jurisdiction under Section 119(2)(b) liberally. Denial would result in unjust enrichment of revenue and undu.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 08:29:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 08:29:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=830174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>NRI petitioner wins TDS refund case despite delayed ITR filing due to Covid travel restrictions under Section 119(2)(b)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89579</link>
      <description>HC allowed petition filed by NRI petitioner seeking TDS refund despite delayed ITR filing. Petitioner, residing in London and Northern Ireland with OCI status, contended Covid-19 pandemic and travel restrictions prevented timely consultation with Indian tax advisors for filing returns. Court held respondent failed to consider petitioner&#039;s non-resident status and genuine hardship caused by pandemic-related travel restrictions. Since petitioner had no statutory obligation to file returns for immovable property sale transactions as non-resident, and demonstrated bona fide reasons for delay, respondent should have exercised discretionary jurisdiction under Section 119(2)(b) liberally. Denial would result in unjust enrichment of revenue and undu.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 08:29:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>